Summary Judgment Case File Evidence Citation Retrieval Dataset
- Records
- 5000
- Size
- 0.2GB
- Format
- JSON
- Provider
MOBIUSI INC- Updated
- v1.02026-11-04
Designed for summary judgment proceedings in commercial litigation, this dataset contains retrieval queries about undisputed material facts and arguments for or against summary judgment, paired with relevant case file records. It connects factual assertions to locatable evidence passages in affidavits, deposition excerpts, documentary evidence, and exhibits, supporting evidence retrieval and knowledge-grounding training based on case records. It can be used to develop and evaluate legal document retrieval applications, but does not replace attorney review of admissibility or legal issues.
Overview
Dataset Insights
Preview
Sample Examples
Schema
Technical Specifications
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| file_name | string | File name |
| query_context | object | Describes the undisputed material fact assertion or argument for or against summary judgment to be searched. |
| citation_quality | object | Assesses the completeness and quality of links between factual assertions and specific, potentially admissible case file passages. |
| case_file_records | array | Source case records for retrieval, including affidavits, deposition excerpts, documentary evidence, and exhibits. |
| retrieval_summary | object | Summarizes case file records relevant to the query assertions and how they support those assertions. |
| evidence_citations | array | Links factual assertions or arguments in the query to specifically locatable evidence passages in the case file. |
Trust
Compliance Statement
Authorization Type
Proprietary - Commercial AI Training License (No Redistribution)
Commercial Use
Requires exclusive subscription or authorization contract (monthly or per-invocation charging)
Privacy and Anonymization
No PII, no real company names, simulated scenarios follow industry standards
Compliance System
Compliant with China's Data Security Law / EU GDPR / supports enterprise data access logs
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does the dataset contain?
- It organizes queries around undisputed material facts and arguments for or against summary judgment, together with case file records, evidence citations, retrieval summaries, and citation quality assessments. Source records include affidavits, deposition excerpts, documentary evidence, and exhibits.
- How are factual assertions linked to evidence?
- Each factual assertion or argument is linked to locatable evidence passages in the case file. Retrieval summaries and citation quality assessments can support training or evaluation of whether search results are grounded in specific record content.
- How can the dataset be obtained, and what are the licensing terms?
- Refer to the product page or provider for delivery options, file formats, and licensing terms. Before use, verify permitted purposes, redistribution restrictions, and applicable privacy and legal requirements. The current description does not specify dataset size or license details.
- Which tasks is the dataset suited for?
- It is suited to legal evidence retrieval, fact-to-evidence matching, case file citation localization, retrieval system evaluation, and legal knowledge-grounding research. It can support search and model training, but does not replace professional legal review or an assessment of evidence admissibility.
Can't find the data you need?
Post a request and let data providers reach out to you.
Get this Dataset
High-quality data, ready for your next AI breakthrough.
Cite this Work
@dataset{Mobiusi2026,
title={Summary Judgment Case File Evidence Citation Retrieval Dataset},
author={MOBIUSI INC},
year={2026},
url={https://www.mobiusi.com/datasets/664965ce2b77f117be8663ffa75c7a78?dataset_scene_cate_type=2},
urldate={2026-10-15},
keywords={summary judgment dataset,legal evidence retrieval,case file citations,commercial litigation data,fact evidence matching,legal document search,evidence passage localization,legal knowledge grounding},
version={1.0}
}Using this in research? Please cite us.